Sometimes students can be confused by a lesson that is a continuation of a subject that they have already learned. They may not make a connection because it is not meaningful to them. I liked the quote from Smith, Bill, and Hughes that stated: “When this occurs, students must apply previously learned rules and procedures with no connection to meaning or understanding, and the opportunities for thinking and reasoning are lost.” From this quote, I understand it as that students will solve a problem step by step from what they learned by the teacher, but they do not actually understand what they are doing, and how to apply it to other problems. As future teachers, we need to find a way to connect the meaning and understanding.
I liked the example they used for fractions. They determined the number of red marbles, and then blue marbles, turning them into fractions. It helped them to show that they are taking a portion out of the whole. I believe the students will be able to add this and apply this to everyday life.
The ttlp is a strategy to use the students’ mathematical thinking critically. Connecting their understanding to critical thinking. It is divided into three sections, 1. Selecting and setting up a mathematical task. 2. Supporting students’ exploration of the task, and 3. Sharing and discussing the task. These three sections of the TTLP help to make the mathematical activities more meaningful so the students can apply it to anything they need, not just in a worksheet. Before giving your lesson, evaluate it. Ask yourself, what ways does the task I’m about to teach build on student’s previous knowledge, life experiences, and culture? What methods will the students be able to use outside of class… what errors may they make? … what misconceptions could they have? Asking yourself these questions before hand will help you to better prepare for this so you can be more accommodating when it does happen. When giving a lesson, you need to be flexible. Not every lesson will go how you had planned. It’s almost better if it doesn’t, because that means that the students have become more involved and engaged, and letting them take the lead is an important part of being a flexible teacher.
Part two of the ttlp is ensuring that your students are on task. How can you ensure they are, and continue guiding them. Plan ahead by making the activities meaningful and entertaining.
The last part of the ttlp is sharing and discussing the task. How will you assess their understandings and review the main events. Do their answers display that they made sense of the mathematical ideas you wanted them to learn, etc.
The ttlp to me is a task for teachers, with step by step ideas on how to make your lesson more effective, and keeping the students engaged. I wonder if my CT knows about this. Yesterday in her math lesson I noticed that the students were not engaged, and bored by her repetitive approaches. I wonder if I showed her this TTLP, if it would help her realize that maybe she needs to adjust her ways so that her students are more interested and therefore more engaged.
Lauren and Rose, when looking at the TTLP graph , does it appear that your CT teaches in this manner. Does she have the students’ interest as she teaches? Is it meaningful to them, or are the students bored?